Search

help me ; i want to show records only logged user delails , how to display

In this example https://jsfiddle.net/4aLmbgwg/8/ there are two examples, it's the same structure repeated twice, a datatables tale with scrollY put into a boostrap "collapse" panel. each has its button to hide/show, but the first is generated already in the "open" state while the second is generated "closed" but the first behaves well even closing and reopening it, while the second, after "opening" has headers completely wrong... apart that, also columns widths seem to work well only in the first... anyway they are different in both cases... Can anyone shade some light, explain how to fix this? Thanks, Marco

Here i attach screen shot, I want to pass id from each column as query string to inidividual link

Got it! http://code.datatables.net/forums/discussion/35979/pdf-page-numbers

Already implemented client side data tables using node js and mysql.

plz give the entair code for full length code

Hello, I have implemented the data data-tables buttons csv and xls & I am passing additional parameters as additional row at top of my header and for safari its ot comming in safari but for the chrome and firefox additional rows comming properly. Also I am triggering the xls and csv button by the jquery trigger function. For some reason csv working fine but not XLS. Please provide me some pointers.

When scrollX= true for columns less than page size,t he value cells do not line up with heading cells.

Hi I´m facing a problem with the columns of header not aligned with the same columns for data rows. What do I need do fix it ?

I am using DataTables to display some objects. At the moment, I am doing the following to update the attribute attr in a row: var data = DT.fnGetData(tr); data.attr = val; DT.fnUpdate(data, tr); This works, but seems quite inelegant. Instead, I think I can just modify the object directly: DT.fnGetData(tr).attr = val; DT.fnDraw(); This code should work as well, as long as the object returned by fnGetData is a direct reference to the internal object (and not a copy). Can anybody confirm whether this will work, or whether this is a bad idea? Is there a better way of doing this?