Search

noticeable for end users. Some combination of #2 and #3 might work as well. Personally I don't mind as a developer just being given the appropriate hooks, though I understand if you want something

EDIT #2: "You sent a payment of $100.00 USD to Allan Jardine" -- Alan, I read in one of these comments that it might be possible to elevate an issue via PayPal. Hope you find this suffici

I dont' wanna disturb original source code as well so I'd like to take approach #2. However, the #2 doesn't look nice for me comparing to the jQuery UI's. Could you give me a example code for me plase

Example #2

if you click that link for my #2 example, you'll see the dynamically created tables rows will show on the screen, but if you view source you won't see the actual tags, etc. you'll just see the loops

$('#2bsorted').dataTable( {

initMatrix = $('#2bsorted').dataTable( {

[tr#0.odd, tr#1.even, tr#2.odd, tr#3.even, tr#4.odd, tr#5.even, tr#6.odd, tr#7.even, tr#8.odd, tr#9.even, tr#10.odd, tr#11.even, tr#12.odd]

// iTotalDisplayRecords count #2 all filtered records

i was getting this javascript error using DataTables 1.5.1 when my had multiple elements:

Yes, we need to keep the class names attached to the TR (as opposed to creating a hidden column and searching on that) because we need to show a visual identifier, such as bolding and text color chang